Track A · the civilian comparator field, built from published data

A market baseline that does not wait for survey returns

The 2024 study surveyed fifteen peer agencies and four of them, including Fairfax County and the City of Fairfax, never returned data. Our method starts from what jurisdictions already publish, which no one can decline to return, and reserves the custom survey for what publication cannot answer: pay practices, incentives, and structure mechanics.

The peer field the Town already validated

Bolton's 2024 custom survey, identified jointly with the Town, drew usable data from eleven agencies: Arlington County, Loudoun County, Prince William County, Falls Church, Herndon, Leesburg, Manassas Park, and the Maryland municipalities of College Park, Gaithersburg, Hyattsville, and Rockville. Four invitees returned nothing: Alexandria, City of Fairfax, City of Manassas, and Fairfax County. We would start from this Town-validated field, add the non-responders through their published pay plans (all four publish), and confirm the final two lists with HR at kickoff, as RFP §4.5.1 provides.

What is actually public, today

Fairfax County publishes every compensation plan as a PDF, FY2026 and FY2027 both. Falls Church posts its class plans, including a stepped police plan. Leesburg's pay grades and salary ranges are Council-adopted and posted. Herndon, City of Fairfax, and Manassas publish adopted budgets with compensation actions. Vienna's own two pay plans are published. For hard-to-fill technical roles, RFP §4.3.3 adds relevant private-sector markets, which we reach through published regional survey sources rather than one-off employer calls.

Scale context: Vienna's ranges against Fairfax County's general plan

Vienna FY 24-25 civilian grades (selected) against Fairfax County FY2026 Pay Plan S grades of comparable span. Sources: Town of Vienna FY 24-25 Pay Plan; Fairfax County FY2026 Compensation Plan S (fairfaxcounty.gov/hr). Fairfax County is the labor-market gravity well every NOVA town competes against for civilian talent; alignment or misalignment with it is a fact a structure design has to face, not a criticism of either plan.

The comparator sources, on the record

Each source verified during preparation of this response, August 2026. This is the documentation standard the delivered study carries: every benchmark traceable to a dated public document.
JurisdictionWhat it publishesWhere
Town of ViennaCivilian pay plan + sworn step scale, updated each fiscal yearviennava.gov, Classification and Compensation
Fairfax CountyAll compensation plans (general, police, sheriff, management), FY2026 and FY2027fairfaxcounty.gov/hr
City of Falls ChurchClassification plans incl. stepped police plan; FY2026 budget added 5% compensationfallschurchva.gov, Classification Plans
Town of LeesburgCouncil-adopted pay and classification plan; pay grades and salary rangesleesburgva.gov, Human Resources
Town of HerndonAdopted budget + transparency tool; pay plan via HRherndon-va.gov
City of FairfaxAdopted budget with compensation detailfairfaxva.gov, Finance/Budget
City of ManassasAdopted budget (FY2026: 3% merit + COLA); FY2027 postedmanassasva.gov, Budget Division
Arlington / Loudoun / PWC / AlexandriaPublished budgets, pay schedules, and public-safety pay actionscounty and city sites

Why this matters for the December 14 date

Custom surveys are the long pole in any comp study: invitations, reminders, partial returns, and the four-of-fifteen silence the 2024 study experienced. Building the baseline from published plans first means market analysis starts the week of kickoff rather than the week the last survey straggles in, and the custom survey that follows is shorter, sharper, and aimed only at what publication cannot answer. On an award-to-delivery window of roughly ten weeks, that sequencing is not a preference. It is the schedule.